|
A simple name, a simple idea, but not from a simple mind! Looking for great news, analysis, and philosophy by an avowed and proud member of the vast right-wing conspiracy? You've found the place!
Blogroll Me!
Issue-Related Posts of Note:
Abortion (Killing of the unborn)
Axis of Evil / Terrorism
Conservatism
Evolution
God
Liberalism
Miscellaneous
Spam
|
JFK Affair
Gosh, is anyone really surprised at the affair between this "Mimi" woman and (nope, not Drew Carey) JFK? Certainly not me. I think all it does is solidify the fact that JFK wasn't as great as some like to think. I'm sure the Democrat American Idol Bill Clinton would think differently, but Camelot wasn't so peachy keen. There were some good things done during Kennedy's Presidency, of course, but that goes for every Presidency.
I wanna know why "Camelot" is used to describe a Presidency during which the President is having sex with bunches of interns (a good assumption) and Marilyn Monroe. Is the word simply describing a facade of perfection? Is it honestly better to LOOK good than to BE good?
Doesn't a lack of marital fidelity destroy a leader's legacy? At least partially? If a guy lies to his marriage vows, how can he as a public leader ever be completely revered? I claim that breaking marriage vows is a significant breach on a person's overall moral character and judgment. If a leader couldn't lead a marriage properly, how could he ever have led a people properly?
posted by Stephen @
12:34 AM
|
Saturday, May 17
|
Hate Mail!
Here's an interesting e-mail I got from a tactless idiot who enjoys using the f-word. Of course, I'll censor all the bad parts. I don't usually resort to namecalling, but when in Rome...you know the rest. Here we go:
Mr. Stephens,
Read the name below each post, you moron. It says STEPHEN. It's my given name: not my surname, you idiot.
Way to go! Really enjoy reading your web site....
You need to visit another great conservative web site!
http://www.[liberal website].com
F*** it. I hate your f******* NAZI web site, Bush is a joke! Brainwashed talk radio junkies like you really need to wake the f*** up and see that fascists and elitists are controlling your mind...
Okay, it's perfectly fine for you to hate my website, but how is it NAZI? What specific ideas have I expressed that make it Nazi, you putrid piece of trash? You call me brainwashed, yet you offer nothing to back up your vapid claims. How are fascists and elitists "controlling my mind"? I could easily posit the idea that liberals control your mind. Actually, though, I think you're just a mindless fool with no ideas and lots of nebulous, empty talk. Saying the f-word multiple times doesn't validate any of your arguments, stupid.
I was a conservative until, I found out that the Republican Party died 30 years ago and was replaced by neo-fascist elitists, who are in control of are media and are [sic] lives!
First of all, it's "our lives," not "are lives," you low-IQ dolt. I'm surprised you can even compose a sentence. You weren't ever a conservative, by the way. It takes at least half a brain to be a conservative, and you certainly don't qualify. HOW did the Republican Party "die" and what PROOF do you have that it is neo-fascist?
Patriot Act 2 takes the 5th and 6th amendment rights away from all of us!
FINALLY, your empty mind gives me something specific to talk about. There are a lot of people opposed to Patriot Act 2. It gives the government a lot of leeway in combatting terrorists. Perhaps too much...I haven't really studied it. Either way, so what? How does that relate to anything I've said on this website, you no-good retard?
Soon your beloved Republican Party will be going after the second amendment, that's right! After the computer voting machines give Bush a win in 2004. They are coming for our guns! But thank "God" there's [sic] idiot, moron, jerk-offs like you on the internet to defend them after they do it!
Such a simple mind. I'm a conservative. Republicans generally hold conservative views. Are you on crack? You make absolutely no sense. Why would computer voting machines "give Bush a win" in 2004? How are they "coming for our guns" when Republicans advocates gun rights? Dumb freak.
You really need a talk show, any radio station would love to have you!
Hell, Foxhole News, ABC, MSNBC, CNN, any of them would take you!
You need to call you talk show... Stephens [sic] Blind Obedience Show!
Or...Conservativism [sic] same thing both will work!
Liberal Media Myth, F*** you...There's no such thing... GE made billions during Iraqi oil war and it had nothing to do with NBC's coverage of the war.....
Huh? How does making money covering a war have anything to do with liberal bias? Coverage is coverage. Obviously, you're an idiot. You can't compose sentences, spell things correctly, or use apostrophes, either. Conservatism is the name of this blog, not Conservativism. Are you in middle school?
Wake up you.... stupid f***! - Don't.... We need people like you to hate to keep us going.......
You ignorant son-of-a-bitch. Give me examples of who I'm hating. I hate terrorists who want to kill me. I hate the killing of babies by ripping them limb-from-limb. Other than that, I don't hate things, not even arrogant, low-IQ losers like you.
Man... Wish we had people like you during the Revolutionary War! We still would be British and wouldn't have all these problems!
Huh? You're a complete fool...that doesn't make ANY sense. Are you high on acid or something?
MH
Ah, great sign off! Can't even put your name, you mental midget? Go read Michael Moore's propaganda-filled website and leave me alone. I'd also advise you to take some English classes to improve your spelling, grammar, and writing style. On the whole, it's horrendous. You're a dumbass.
This e-mail is an illustration of how some people on the extreme left think. They've got few arguments and lots of hatred. Whew...thankfully, not all of them are filled with this much unneeded vitriol! If I haven't said it before, I'll say it now: anyone who disagrees with ANY of my posts is free to e-mail me about them! I enjoy debating. Even if I strongly disagree with you, I'll be nice to you if you're nice to me. But don't give me e-mails like this one. This one is a husk. It's empty--and from an empty mind.
posted by Stephen @
12:32 AM
|
Thursday, May 15
|
I believe it is our fate to be here. It is our destiny.
I stole that line from The Matrix Reloaded! Cool line, though, isn't it? With all the hype, I had to post a LITTLE something about it.
It actually opened late night tonight (10PM) in some locations. I decided not to see it tonight, but I will soon enough!
Here are some other good movies that are coming out this year that look to be interesting:
Dumb and Dumberer
Bruce Almighty
Terminator 3
Matrix Revolutions
Lord of the Rings: Return of the King
posted by Stephen @
11:29 PM
|
Wednesday, May 14
|
Another Blow To Evolutionary Theory
Considering the "slime to man" theory has more holes in it than a gunned-down block of swiss cheese, it's not really a surprise. Nonetheless, this new chink in the ever-dynamic and never-can-be-questioned-because-it-must-be-true theory involves DNA from Neanderthals (or, "NeanderTals," to you science pedants) and Cro-Magnons.
An Italian study essentially said that modern-day humans could not have arisen from Neanderthals. In other words, we don't possess a lick of Neanderthal DNA in our cells. That's awfully strange, considering they were contemporaries with the Cro-Mags and all. Seems like over the "vast" time spans through which they coexisted they would have mixed just a wee bit.
Also, it looks to be evident that Neanderthals were pretty advanced human beings. They weren't ape men by any stretch of the imagination. They were almost like us homo sapiens sapiens. In fact, it's almost like they were a tribe of regular human beings whose bones have been misrepresented in order to try to establish a non-existent missing link between monkeys and humans! Ya think?
For the record, I don't have all the answers about exactly how the Earth and mankind arose (apart from God creating it all). But I do know one thing: Darwinian evolution is a pretty poor way of explaining it. It doesn't add up on all too many levels. I don't know about you, but faith should be reserved for God, not scientific theories.
posted by Stephen @
10:23 PM
|
|
Mass Graves & Evil Nuts
The latest mass grave of Saddam Hussein's evil, despotic--and thankfully toppled--regime contains 3,000 bodies. At least, so far. And the bodies aren't really bodies anymore. They're bones. Many of the poor Shi'ites who tried to rebel back after Gulf War I were punished with their lives; many of their family members couldn't fully grieve until now. It's sad.
The United States is partially to blame for encouraging an uprising and not giving help. But not as much as you might think. As an astute pundit pointed out on a talk show this evening, the UN wouldn't have wanted Bush 41 to go into Baghdad. They would have made an unbelievable ruckus about the whole thing, and Bush didn't want to deal with it. So, good or bad, he cowtowed. If foresight was 20/20, he would have removed Saddam at the time. (It's also worth noting that we didn't have such pinpoint accuracy back then. There would have been MANY more civilian casualties.)
Here's a quote from the article that will lead to Stephen's Immutable Law of Evil Nut Talk (SILENT):
Many of the onlookers were weeping, and some chanted: "There is no God but Allah, and the Baath (Party) is the enemy of Allah"
I agree with the quote, but these are good people alluding to God in a proper way. Evil nuts like Saddam refer to God in an IMPROPER way. How can we determine who has the moral authority to talk about God? That leads me to SILENT:
No matter how often one talks about, alludes to, or prays to God, if one is evil, one is STILL evil.
So, Saddam, if you're still alive, talk about Allah all you want. Try to use it as fodder to get all the wackos mad at the United States. When all is said and done, you're still evil.
posted by Stephen @
3:52 PM
|
|
Burn In Hell
It's disgusting that these idiots have NOTHING better to do than try to cause terror and misery.
The more I think about it, the more it angers me. Toppling the Afghani and Iraqi terrorist regimes was just the beginning. This war isn't close to being over. Actually, this battle isn't even over until Al Qaeda ceases to exist. These terrorists must be wiped away from the face of the planet. It's irrespective of their political cause, national origin, or race: they're evil. These are people that, when they encounter trouble, blow themselves up. Did Gandhi blow himself up? Did Martin Luther King blow himself up? The bottom line is they've gotta die before more of US die...perhaps on a bigger scale.
At least they're blowing up stuff in their own country, though. Yes, Saudi Arabia. It's where the majority of the 9/11 hijackers hailed from. Strangely, we don't view them as a terrorist state. This will sound liberal, but we need to slowly wean ourselves away from oil and towards hydrogen so we don't have to depend on these terrorist-sympathizing regimes for petroleum.
And, by the way, to those Israelis (and Jews) out there, a lot of us here in America stand with you.

posted by Stephen @
4:56 PM
|
Tuesday, May 13
|
Liberal Media Red Herring
Perhaps it's just a slow news week. (That's being optimistic.) There's a story that's been circulating concerning President Bush's upcoming speech to plastic workers in Omaha that, well, doesn't make any sense to me. It's completely biased as well as being a total nonstarter.
CNN's (et al.) couldn't-possibly-be-tendentious title to the story is "Workers to pay for Bush speech." In the title bar of the browser, it also reads, "Bush speech lightens workers wallets." What they want you to read from that is, "Bush cares nothing about working families. He's a rich, white Republican." You know, those titles seem pretty biased to me before even knowing what the story is actually about.
Ready for this? There's ZERO truth to it. ZERO! Bush is giving a speech in a plastic manufacturing plant in Omaha, Nebraska, today to talk about the tax cut that just passed. Part of the plant will be shut down in order for the President to speak. The workers were given FOUR--yes, FOUR--options to make up for part of the plant being shut down:
1. Use a vacation day.
2. Take the day off and work on Saturday.
3. Work their regular shift in a part of plant that will stay open.
4. Take an unpaid day off.
This story could possibly be THE quintessential liberal-media-biased story. It's much ado about absolutely JACK SQUAT. To the workers, it's a minor inconvenience at the very worst, and it's to accommodate the President of the United States! Shoot, the company will get some good press for this. It'll probably help the workers in the long run!
And, besides, maybe some of them were looking for a good excuse to take a day off.
posted by Stephen @
11:38 AM
|
Monday, May 12
|
Doesn't This Piss You Off?
Supposedly, Saddam Hussein is still in Iraq! He's also said to be "organizing resistance." How?! He's got nothing. Without a government, money really won't create all that much short-term, effective resistance.
Either way, it's aggravating. We don't have Bin Laden, and we don't have Saddam. Though our military actions in Afghanistan and Iraq were both unquestionably successful, we really need these idiots to make examples of to all would-be terrorists, terrorist sympathizers, and/or terrorist sympathizing nations (i.e. DPRK, Syria, Iran). I'd love to see them both on trial in the United States.
Saddam and Bin Laden on the witness stand! Wouldn't that be sweet?!
posted by Stephen @
11:01 AM
|
|
|
|